000			01958nab a2200193 c 4500
001			myd_81197
003			ES-MaCDM
005			20241001092951.0
008			181003s2009 stk||||fr 00| u|eng u
040			_aES-MaCDM
100	1		_aJones, Susan _9136302
245	0		_aDiaghilev and British Writing _cSusan Jones
260			_c2009 _aEdinburgh: _bEdinburgh University Press,
300			_a28 p.
520			_aRESUMEN: This article explores the diversity of British literary responses to Diaghilev's project, emphasising the way in which the subject matter and methodologies of Diaghilev's modernism were sometimes unexpectedly echoed in expressions of contemporary British writing. These discussions emerge both in writing about Diaghilev's work, and, more discretely, when references to the Russian Ballet find their way into the creative writing of the period, serving to anchor the texts in a particular cultural milieu or to suggest contemporary aesthetic problems in the domain of literary aesthetics developing in the period. Figures from disparate fields, including literature, music and the visual arts, brought to their criticism of the Ballets Russes their individual perspectives on its aesthetics, helping to consolidate the sense of its importance in contributing to the inter-disciplinary flavour of modernism across the arts. In the field of literature, not only did British writers evaluate the Ballets Russes in terms of their own poetics, their relationship to experimentation in the novel and in drama, they developed an increasing sense of the company's place in dance history, its choreographic innovations offering material for wider discussions, opening up the potential for literary modernism's interest in impersonality and in the 'unsayable', discussions of the body, primitivism and gender.
773	0		_tDance Research _072889 _wmyd_16032 _gVol. 27, núm. 1, Summer 2009, p. 65 - 92
903			_a81197 _b81197
942			_cART _2z
999			_c119184 _d119184