000			01303nab a2200181 c 4500
001			myd_86593
003			ES-MaCDM
005			20240917124642.0
008			181003s2012 sp ||||fr 00| u|spa u
040			_aES-MaCDM
100	1		_aParrott, Andrew _9131243
245	0		_aHigh clefs and down-to-earth transposition _b a brief defence of Monteverdi _cPARROTT, Andrew
260			_c2012: _bOxford University Press, _aLondon; Oxford
520			_aRESUMEN: Focusing on tha Magnificat a7 in Monteverdi´s 1610 publication, this article repudiates the recently repeated proposal by Roger Bowers that its high-clef notation demands transposition down a mere 2nd (for which there is no known contemporary precedent);100 clear instancesof transposition by the convetional 4th (and 5th) are listed. Besides its implausible resultant Fminor, the narrower transposition cannot be justified on the basis of perceived "inconsistencies" of range, as Monteverdi´s own music (and others) provides ample avidence of lower vocal scoring tham is expected today. Keywords: Claudio Monteverdi, 1610 Verpers, Magnificat a7, high clefs, transposition, vocal range, Thomas Morley, Roger Bowers.
773	0		_tEarly Music _072886 _wmyd_16029 _gVol. 40, núm. 1,Feb. 2012, p. 81
903			_a86593 _b86593
942			_cART
999			_c123012 _d123012