000 02600nab a2200181 c 4500
001 myd_86953
003 ES-MaCDM
005 20240920114012.0
008 181003s2013 sp ||||fr 00| u|spa u
040 _aES-MaCDM
100 1 _aIrvine, Thomas
_9132951
245 0 _aNormality and Emplotment
_b Walter Leigh's 'Midsummer Night's Dream' in the Third Reich and Britain
_cIRVINE, Thomas
260 _c2013:
_bOxford University Press,
_aOxford
520 _aRESUMEN: This article explores current controversies in the historiography of music in Nazi Germany by focusing on the case of the English composer Walter Leigh's acceptance in 1936 of a commission from the German pedagogue Hilmar Höckner to write incidental music for a schoolboy production of Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream. Leigh, who was killed in action in North Africa in 1942, has been criticized for taking this commission, notably by Fred K. Prieberg in his ground-breaking study of 'replacement' compositions for Mendelssohn's iconic work, which had fallen into disfavour (for obvious reasons) in Nazi Germany. In this essay I attempt a detailed micro-history of this piece, beginning with Leigh and Höckner's first meeting in the later years of the Weimar Republic and following their collaboration across the watershed of the Nazi assumption of power in 1933. I show that while neither man followed an overt political agenda, both were at some level aware of the political implications of their collaboration. Leigh, for instance, included an obvious quotation from Mendelssohn's setting in his own, and Höckner attempted to explain the commission defending it as an experiment in good pedagogy 'also' made necessary by the impossibility of performing the Mendelssohn version. I also trace Höckner's two tours of Britain (in 1938 and 1939), both of which included performances of Leigh's Midsummer Night's Dream music, one sponsored by the pro-German Anglo-German Fellowship. Finally, I consider both Höckner and Leigh's own political writings: the former defended his Hindemith-inspired pedagogic approach as late as 1943, and the latter, in public and private, took a decidedly anti-pacifist position in the run-up to the outbreak of war in 1939. The essay ends with a discussion of current approaches to narrating the history of music under Nazism. I argue that influential work in the field does not consider the special 'modes of emplotment' (Hayden White) this history requires.
773 0 _tMusic & Letters
_072904
_wmyd_16047
_gVol. 94, núm. 2,May 2013, p. 295
903 _a86953
_b86953
942 _cART
999 _c123237
_d123237