000			01370nab a2200193 c 4500
001			myd_87304
003			ES-MaCDM
005			20241001092959.0
008			181003s2003 stk||||fr 00| u|eng u
040			_aES-MaCDM
100	1		_aPritchard, Jane _9102994
245	0		_a'More Natural Than Nature, More Artificial Than Art' _b The Dance Criticism of Arthur Symons _cJane Pritchard
260			_c2003 _aEdinburgh: _bEdinburgh University Press,
300			_a54 p.
520			_aRESUMEN: "Dance criticism as a serious concern in Britain dates inly from the 1920s, when T. S. Eliot, among others, contributed to the arguments stimulated by Diaghilev." This was the opinion expressed by Peter Brinson in an address to the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures&Commerce in 1989. Many others subscribe to this view, which is the result of the prevailing belief that there was no dance of real significance in this country prior to performances by Serge Diaghilev's Ballets Russes and the pioneering work of Marie Rambert and Ninette de Valois. This small selection from the writing of Arthur Symons, a prolific commentator on dance in the 1890s and early 1900s, will, I hope, encourage reassessment of such attitudes.
773	0		_tDance Research _072889 _wmyd_16032 _gVol. 21, núm. 2, Winter 2003, p. 36 - 89
903			_a87304 _b87304
942			_cART _2z
999			_c123432 _d123432