| 000 | 01694nab a2200193 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | myd_91112 | ||
| 003 | ES-MaCDM | ||
| 005 | 20241001093010.0 | ||
| 008 | 181003s2010 stk||||fr 00| u|eng u | ||
| 040 | _aES-MaCDM | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aWatts, Victoria _9103739 |
|
| 245 | 0 |
_aDancing the Score _bDance Notation and Differance _cVictoria Watts |
|
| 260 |
_c2010 _aEdinburgh: _bEdinburgh University Press, |
||
| 300 | _a12 p. | ||
| 520 | _aRESUMEN: This article moves towards an explanation of the kinds of meaning captured in dance notation, towards a critical reflection on linguistic accounts of meaning in dance, and towards a model of analysis that slips free from the dichotomy of theory versus practice, and its correlate of text versus experience. In following Derrida's argument about speech and writing, and through a re-reading of his account of the myth of Theuth, I suggest that dance notation sensuously illustrates the kind of binary-destabilising matter and movement that Derrida theorises variously as trace, différance, and arche-writing. Further, I propose that dance notation, in its relationship to theatrical dance, provides an exemplary, rather than a unique, textual practice: one which necessarily annihilates the old mind/body and speech/writing dualisms. While Derrida achieves this through elaborate, often mischievous, wordplay in his deconstructions, I reflect upon the etymology of choreography and choreology, upon the process of reading and writing a dance score, and upon the marginal status of notation within the dance field. | ||
| 773 | 0 |
_tDance Research _072889 _wmyd_16032 _gVol. 28, núm. 1, Summer 2010, p. 7 - 18 |
|
| 903 |
_a91112 _b91112 |
||
| 942 |
_cART _2z |
||
| 999 |
_c126224 _d126224 |
||